Our sexed and gendered bodies are haunted by the spectres of those queer bodies and desires which have to be excluded and disavowed. The short film has a similar premise to the feature film about a. It was three-minute-long and created by Sandberg and his wife for a film festival called the Bloody Cuts Horror Challenge. Instead, the movie is an adaptation of an eponymous 2013 Swedish short film by director David F. Butler’s work allows us to understand how not only gender, but also sex and sexuality are formed in relation to normative and normalizing frameworks. Think about this: Diana, Goddess of the Moon and Hunt, was so outraged at discovering that Actaeon spying on her and her nymphs. No, ‘Lights Out’ is not based on a true story. Since no interpretation happens outside of social practices and institutions, the critical potential lies in how questions of gender allow us to examine our discursive regimes and practices at the junctures of bodies and power. Secondly, if we bring gender as interpretative category to biblical texts, it will neither do to simply rebuke the scriptures as a lore of male, straight domination, nor to simply herald the scriptures as a well of gender emancipation. Firstly, drawing on Judith Butler’s theoretical work, the paper argues that if we want to consider gender, we must consider how sexuality and power constitute our bodies as gendered bodies. They both know Diana is real, shes in the house, and are well aware that light will protect them. This is about justice and accountability. The Book of Judith, the Abraham and Sarah story in Genesis and the Book of Ruth). But, as Woodson recently said to me, Grace is not the issue this is not about forgiveness. This article offers two related arguments on gender as critical category for reading biblical texts (i.e. After situating this event in the corpus of Davidic narratives, the paper examines David’s inner worldthe David with Bathshebaby drawing on the. 10101097 bce), king of Israel and Judah, especially his personal, familial, and professional undoing through his adultery with Bathsheba and the killing of her husband, Uriah the Hittite. Judith’s baths, unlike those of Bathsheba and Susanna, are a calculated part of a larger seduction routine. This paper explores the person of David (ca. Using close readings of the three texts and feminist interpretive strategies, Tamber-Rosenau argues that Judith, unlike the other two bathing women, choreographs her exposure for maximum effect. Judith uses the idea that a bathing woman is an irresistible object of desire to her advantage and so arranges semipublic baths while she is in an Assyrian military camp. This paper argues that Judith is the only one of the three to whom the biblical text actually does attribute seductive motives. Curiously, though, neither traditional scholars portraying the characters as femmes fatales nor feminist interpreters defending them have brought a third biblical bathing woman, Judith, into the discussion. Despite what is not a hint of seductive intent in their stories, many interpreters have portrayed these two characters as, essentially, “asking for it.” Feminist scholars have worked to rehabilitate Bathsheba and Susanna’s reputations. Rebecca races to the light switch, just as the light of the sign turns off, but she is able to flip on the light switch to her bedroom in time. The famous baths of two biblical women, Bathsheba and Susanna, captured the lust of their respective onlookers.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |